:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/19646965/20130914_mje_se2_428.0.jpg)
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here. Or just skip to the words. I won't be offended. (Okay, I'll only be a little offended.)
These teams' success rates on passing downs were better than most are on standard downs. We'll have to wait a week or two to find out how much of this is defensive weakness and how much is just incredible offensive strength.
Alabama 49, Texas A&M 42 |
||||||
| Alabama | Texas A&M | Alabama | Texas A&M | |||
| Close % | 97.1% | STANDARD DOWNS | ||||
| Field Position % | 45.5% | 49.3% | Success Rate | 63.3% | 54.2% | |
| Leverage % | 74.2% | 71.6% | PPP | 0.70 | 0.62 | |
| S&P | 1.331 | 1.165 | ||||
| TOTAL | ||||||
| EqPts | 53.4 | 59.1 | PASSING DOWNS | |||
| Close Success Rate | 62.1% | 52.2% | Success Rate | 58.8% | 47.4% | |
| Close PPP | 0.81 | 0.78 | PPP | 1.13 | 1.19 | |
| Close S&P | 1.430 | 1.306 | S&P | 1.714 | 1.662 | |
| RUSHING | TURNOVERS | |||||
| EqPts | 22.2 | 15.2 | Number | 1 | 2 | |
| Close Success Rate | 67.6% | 50.0% | Turnover Pts | 5.6 | 15.3 | |
| Close PPP | 0.60 | 0.45 | Turnover Pts Margin | +9.7 | -9.7 | |
| Close S&P | 1.275 | 0.947 | ||||
| Line Yards/carry | 4.34 | 3.80 | Q1 S&P | 1.371 | 1.474 | |
| Q2 S&P | 1.960 | 1.024 | ||||
| PASSING | Q3 S&P | 1.083 | 0.978 | |||
| EqPts | 31.2 | 43.9 | Q4 S&P | 1.286 | 1.975 | |
| Close Success Rate | 55.2% | 54.1% | ||||
| Close PPP | 1.08 | 1.06 | 1st Down S&P | 1.418 | 1.192 | |
| Close S&P | 1.628 | 1.597 | 2nd Down S&P | 1.557 | 1.356 | |
| SD/PD Sack Rate | 0.0% / 0.0% | 4.0% / 0.0% | 3rd Down S&P | 1.063 | 2.325 | |
| Projected Pt. Margin: Alabama +3.9 | Actual Pt. Margin: Alabama +7 | ||||||
Turnovers were the deciding factor, but ... wow, what an explosive game.