/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/19684875/180585985.0.jpg)
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here. Or just skip to the words. I won't be offended. (Okay, I'll only be a little offended.)
Total yards right now: USC 381, Vandy 49.
— Scott Hood (@ScottHood63) September 15, 2013
South Carolina 35, Vanderbilt 25 |
||||||
Vandy | SC | Vandy | SC | |||
Close % | 74.6% | STANDARD DOWNS | ||||
Field Position % | 50.9% | 35.6% | Success Rate | 42.9% | 60.8% | |
Leverage % | 63.6% | 69.9% | PPP | 0.46 | 0.50 | |
S&P | 0.886 | 1.111 | ||||
TOTAL | ||||||
EqPts | 25.3 | 51.4 | PASSING DOWNS | |||
Close Success Rate | 36.4% | 58.9% | Success Rate | 25.0% | 54.6% | |
Close PPP | 0.40 | 0.64 | PPP | 0.30 | 0.96 | |
Close S&P | 0.763 | 1.229 | S&P | 0.550 | 1.502 | |
RUSHING | TURNOVERS | |||||
EqPts | 14.5 | 17.6 | Number | 2 | 3 | |
Close Success Rate | 35.7% | 53.7% | Turnover Pts | 9.9 | 18.1 | |
Close PPP | 0.46 | 0.35 | Turnover Pts Margin | +8.3 | -8.3 | |
Close S&P | 0.814 | 0.884 | ||||
Line Yards/carry | 3.41 | 3.12 | Q1 S&P | 0.514 | 1.581 | |
Q2 S&P | 0.952 | 1.042 | ||||
PASSING | Q3 S&P | 1.063 | 1.208 | |||
EqPts | 10.7 | 33.8 | Q4 S&P | 0.982 | 0.752 | |
Close Success Rate | 36.8% | 65.6% | ||||
Close PPP | 0.36 | 1.01 | 1st Down S&P | 1.070 | 0.990 | |
Close S&P | 0.726 | 1.671 | 2nd Down S&P | 0.841 | 1.181 | |
SD/PD Sack Rate | 0.0% / 0.0% | 8.3% / 28.6% | 3rd Down S&P | 0.361 | 1.542 | |
Projected Pt. Margin: South Carolina +17.8 | Actual Pt. Margin: South Carolina +10 |
So basically, South Carolina played a nearly perfect first 20 minutes, put the game out of reach, then got sloppy. Vandy used turnovers and a lopsided late field-position advantage to make this a much closer game than it really should have been, but the stats aren't fooled. When the game was within reach, it was all S.C. (And I'm officially quite concerned about what was supposed to be a great Vandy pass defense.)
Oh yeah, and passes to Vandy players not named Jordan Matthews were 4-for-10 for 38 yards.
Loading comments...