Offensive Drive Efficiency and the BCS Bowls

Bob Donnan-USA TODAY Sports

Last week I took a look at defensive drive efficiency and the BCS by calculating average points per possession and plays per possession for the BCS teams. This week I did the same for offenses, then juxtaposed offensive and defensive points per possession on a scatterplot showing overall possession efficiency.

Possession-based metrics are a simple and intuitive alternative to play-based or point-based metrics (such as yards per play, points per play, yards per point). This is only an introductory look at the BCS Bowl teams, so theoretically these teams should be clustered around a small, elite part of the overall range for FBS teams. In other words, these are already some of the best offenses in the FBS, so the differences between them may not be very great relative to the entire FBS.

Same story, different side of the ball—Florida State is not only the most efficient in terms of offensive points per possession, but manages to have the shortest drives of all. That’s indicative of either a high number of explosive plays per drive or good starting field position. There’s some evidence to support that notion, too: Florida State is first in plays of ten or more yards, tied for first in plays of 20+ yards, second in the FEI field position index, and first in "short field drives."

On the other end of the spectrum, Oklahoma has far and away the lowest points per possession at 2.22, as well as the highest number of plays per offensive possession. The latter point isn’t necessarily a bad thing for the Sooners (at least there shouldn’t be too many three-and-outs there), but it does imply a good number of longer drives without points when also looking at the points per possession.

Team Offensive Plays per Possession Offensive Points per Possession
Stanford 5.73 2.64
Michigan State 5.84 2.57
Ohio State 5.76 3.47
Clemson 5.90 2.72
Oklahoma 6.00 2.22
Alabama 5.85 3.07
Florida State 5.57 3.80
Auburn 5.64 2.87
UCF 5.83 2.72
Baylor 5.58 3.14

Again, the range isn’t very large between the BCS teams — all are good offenses, ranked between first and 51st in offensive F/+.

Plotting offensive and defensive points per possession on a two-way scatterplot gives a decent picture of the overall strength of a team and a way to quickly approximate match-ups in the bowl games. Obviously the goal for any team is to be as close to the top right-hand corner as possible (with Florida State). Unfortunately these aren’t opponent-adjusted numbers because I don’t have possession efficiency data for the entire FBS.

This two-way makes Florida State, Alabama, and Baylor look like lopsided favorites. Michigan State has a steep defensive edge over Stanford and is barely less efficient on offense (.07 points per possession). The Ohio State-Clemson matchup is more of a toss-up, as Ohio State has a much higher average points per possession, but allows an average of .17 points per possession more than Clemson’s defense.

Trending Discussions

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Football Study Hall

You must be a member of Football Study Hall to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Football Study Hall. You should read them.

Join Football Study Hall

You must be a member of Football Study Hall to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Football Study Hall. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.