:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47291160/GettyImages-490189970.0.jpg)
:format(webp):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/4101846/Screen_Shot_2015-09-27_at_6.37.33_PM.0.png)
Top 5 Plays
|
|
Play Number |
Name |
Down-Distance-Spot |
Quarter |
Play Description |
Home Team WP Before Play |
Home Team WP Added |
|
1 |
249 |
Texas Tech |
1-10-50 |
4 |
Patrick Mahomes II Pass to DeAndre Washington for 40, FIRST DOWN |
0.480 |
-0.480 |
|
2 |
241 |
TCU |
4-4-4 |
4 |
Trevone Boykin Pass to Aaron Green for 4, TOUCHDOWN |
0.672 |
-0.332 |
|
3 |
218 |
Texas Tech |
2-7-50 |
4 |
Patrick Mahomes II Pass to Justin Stockton for 50, TOUCHDOWN |
0.468 |
0.319 |
|
4 |
207 |
TCU |
2-5-21 |
4 |
Kyle Hicks Rush for 21, TOUCHDOWN |
0.681 |
-0.317 |
|
5 |
94 |
TCU |
3-11-52 |
2 |
Trevone Boykin Pass to Josh Doctson for 52, TOUCHDOWN |
0.617 |
-0.213 |
Four 30-percent shifts in the final quarter! This game was bananas.
TCU 55, Texas Tech 52
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here.
| Basics | TCU | Texas Tech | Nat'l Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays | 103 | 84 | |
| Close Rate (non-garbage time) | 100.0% | ||
| Avg Starting FP | 30.2 | 24.1 | 29.5 |
| Possessions | 14 | 15 | |
| Scoring Opportunities* |
10 | 8 | |
| Points Per Opportunity | 5.20 | 6.50 | 4.82 |
| Leverage Rate** | 68.9% | 70.2% | 68.5% |
| Close S&P*** | 0.683 | 0.676 | 0.588 |
|
* A scoring opportunity occurs when an offense gets a first down inside the opponent's 40 (or scores from outside the 40). ** Leverage Rate = Standard Downs / (Standard Downs + Passing Downs) *** When using IsoPPP, the S&P formula is (0.8*Success Rate) + (0.2*IsoPPP) |
|||
| EqPts (what's this?) | TCU | Texas Tech | |
| Total | 71.9 | 59.7 | |
| Rushing | 22.1 | 23.6 | |
| Passing | 49.8 | 36.0 | |
| Success Rate (what's this?) | TCU | Texas Tech | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 51.5% | 39.3% | 41.9% |
| Rushing (close) | 48.9% | 44.7% | 42.8% |
| Passing (close) | 53.6% | 34.8% | 40.9% |
| Standard Downs | 52.1% | 40.7% | 47.3% |
| Passing Downs | 50.0% | 36.0% | 30.2% |
| IsoPPP (what's this?) | TCU | Texas Tech | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 1.36 | 1.81 | 1.27 |
| Rushing (close) | 0.96 | 1.39 | 1.06 |
| Passing (close) | 1.66 | 2.25 | 1.49 |
| Standard Downs | 1.10 | 1.84 | 1.11 |
| Passing Downs | 1.94 | 1.72 | 1.80 |
| Line Stats | TCU | Texas Tech | Nat'l Avg |
| Line Yards/Carry (what's this?) | 2.85 | 2.95 | 2.84 |
| Std. Downs Sack Rt. | 0.0% | 3.9% | 4.7% |
| Pass. Downs Sack Rt. | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.8% |
| Turnovers | TCU | Texas Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Turnovers | 0 | 0 |
| Turnover Points (what's this?) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Turnover Margin | +0 | |
| Exp. TO Margin | Texas Tech +0.15 | |
| TO Luck (Margin vs. Exp. Margin) | TCU +0.15 | |
| TO Points Margin | +0 | |
| Situational | TCU | Texas Tech |
| Q1 S&P | 0.722 | 0.823 |
| Q2 S&P | 0.681 | 0.605 |
| Q3 S&P | 0.671 | 0.648 |
| Q4 S&P | 0.702 | 0.687 |
| 1st Down S&P | 0.711 | 0.757 |
| 2nd Down S&P | 0.652 | 0.738 |
| 3rd Down S&P | 0.656 | 0.638 |
| Projected Scoring Margin: TCU by 12.2 | ||
| Actual Scoring Margin: TCU by 3 | ||
For the second straight game, Tech was absolutely clinical at finishing drives when it got opportunities. And while it's funny to say in a game that featured 107 points, TCU left some points on the board, and it very nearly cost the Frogs.
Very nearly.
Loading comments...