:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47249252/usa-today-8816588.0.jpg)
Georgia Tech @ Notre Dame
:format(webp):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/4084692/Screen_Shot_2015-09-21_at_6.33.18_PM.0.png)
Top Plays
|
Play Number |
Offense |
Down-Distance-Spot |
Quarter |
Play Description |
Home Team Win Probability Before Play |
Home Team Win Probability Added |
|
19 |
Notre Dame |
3-20-46 |
1 |
DeShone Kizer Pass to Will Fuller for 46, TOUCHDOWN |
0.550 |
0.183 |
|
87 |
Notre Dame |
2-1-61 |
2 |
DeShone Kizer Pass to Alizé Jones for 6 |
0.810 |
-0.144 |
|
98 |
Georgia Tech |
1-10-63 |
3 |
Justin Thomas Rush for -2, FUMBLE |
0.717 |
0.139 |
|
62 |
Georgia Tech |
2-5-58 |
2 |
Broderick Snoddy Rush for 48, FIRST DOWN |
0.743 |
-0.136 |
|
71 |
Notre Dame |
3-7-68 |
2 |
DeShone Kizer Pass to Will Fuller for 36, FIRST DOWN |
0.541 |
0.135 |
Notre Dame 30, Georgia Tech 22
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here.
| Basics | Georgia Tech | Notre Dame | Nat'l Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays | 74 | 62 | |
| Close Rate (non-garbage time) | 90.4% | ||
| Avg Starting FP | 31.3 | 33.2 | 29.6 |
| Possessions | 14 | 14 | |
| Scoring Opportunities* |
6 | 6 | |
| Points Per Opportunity | 3.50 | 5.17 | 4.82 |
| Leverage Rate** | 62.3% | 72.6% | 68.7% |
| Close S&P*** | 0.484 | 0.671 | 0.587 |
|
* A scoring opportunity occurs when an offense gets a first down inside the opponent's 40 (or scores from outside the 40). ** Leverage Rate = Standard Downs / (Standard Downs + Passing Downs) *** When using IsoPPP, the S&P formula is (0.8*Success Rate) + (0.2*IsoPPP) |
|||
| EqPts (what's this?) | Georgia Tech | Notre Dame | |
| Total | 30.3 | 42.7 | |
| Rushing | 18.7 | 21.4 | |
| Passing | 11.6 | 21.2 | |
| Success Rate (what's this?) | Georgia Tech | Notre Dame | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 31.2% | 48.4% | 41.8% |
| Rushing (close) | 31.7% | 51.6% | 42.8% |
| Passing (close) | 30.0% | 45.2% | 40.7% |
| Standard Downs | 44.7% | 53.3% | 47.3% |
| Passing Downs | 8.7% | 35.3% | 29.8% |
| IsoPPP (what's this?) | Georgia Tech | Notre Dame | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 1.17 | 1.42 | 1.26 |
| Rushing (close) | 1.11 | 1.34 | 1.06 |
| Passing (close) | 1.31 | 1.52 | 1.49 |
| Standard Downs | 1.19 | 0.82 | 1.10 |
| Passing Downs | 1.08 | 3.82 | 1.81 |
| Line Stats | Georgia Tech | Notre Dame | Nat'l Avg |
| Line Yards/Carry (what's this?) | 1.93 | 3.27 | 2.83 |
| Std. Downs Sack Rt. | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.7% |
| Pass. Downs Sack Rt. | 8.3% | 7.7% | 6.6% |
| Turnovers | Georgia Tech | Notre Dame |
|---|---|---|
| Turnovers | 1 | 2 |
| Turnover Points (what's this?) | 4.1 | 10.4 |
| Turnover Margin | Georgia Tech +1 | |
| Exp. TO Margin | Notre Dame +1.9 | |
| TO Luck (Margin vs. Exp. Margin) | Georgia Tech +2.9 | |
| TO Points Margin | Georgia Tech +6.3 points | |
| Situational | Georgia Tech | Notre Dame |
| Q1 S&P | 0.400 | 0.631 |
| Q2 S&P | 0.562 | 0.663 |
| Q3 S&P | 0.515 | 0.637 |
| Q4 S&P | 0.553 | 0.840 |
| 1st Down S&P | 0.524 | 0.701 |
| 2nd Down S&P | 0.563 | 0.569 |
| 3rd Down S&P | 0.600 | 0.727 |
| Projected Scoring Margin: Notre Dame by 6.1 | ||
| Actual Scoring Margin: Notre Dame by 8 | ||
Kudos, Irish. I was (and still am) high on Georgia Tech, and you rendered then less efficient than I thought anybody could. A 32% rushing success rate? Yeah, Tech's not winning many games like that. (And, in reverse, kudos to Tech for staying within 8 points with no efficiency.)