:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47201198/usa-today-8797098.0.jpg)
Georgia 31, Vanderbilt 14
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here.
| Basics | Georgia | Vanderbilt | Nat'l Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays | 66 | 89 | |
| Close Rate (non-garbage time) | 76.1% | ||
| Avg Starting FP | 24.5 | 31.1 | 29.7 |
| Possessions | 12 | 15 | |
| Scoring Opportunities* |
5 | 9 | |
| Points Per Opportunity | 3.40 | 1.44 | 4.80 |
| Leverage Rate** | 61.5% | 56.1% | 68.3% |
| Close S&P*** | 0.641 | 0.421 | 0.584 |
|
* A scoring opportunity occurs when an offense gets a first down inside the opponent's 40 (or scores from outside the 40). ** Leverage Rate = Standard Downs / (Standard Downs + Passing Downs) *** When using IsoPPP, the S&P formula is (0.8*Success Rate) + (0.2*IsoPPP) |
|||
| EqPts (what's this?) | Georgia | Vanderbilt | |
| Total | 38.2 | 36.3 | |
| Rushing | 25.6 | 10.9 | |
| Passing | 12.6 | 25.4 | |
| Success Rate (what's this?) | Georgia | Vanderbilt | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 40.4% | 24.2% | 41.3% |
| Rushing (close) | 40.0% | 15.6% | 42.5% |
| Passing (close) | 40.9% | 32.4% | 40.1% |
| Standard Downs | 43.8% | 24.3% | 46.8% |
| Passing Downs | 35.0% | 24.1% | 29.6% |
| IsoPPP (what's this?) | Georgia | Vanderbilt | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 1.59 | 1.14 | 1.27 |
| Rushing (close) | 1.89 | 1.79 | 1.06 |
| Passing (close) | 1.19 | 0.84 | 1.49 |
| Standard Downs | 1.54 | 0.87 | 1.10 |
| Passing Downs | 1.70 | 1.48 | 1.83 |
| Line Stats | Georgia | Vanderbilt | Nat'l Avg |
| Line Yards/Carry (what's this?) | 3.34 | 2.36 | 2.80 |
| Std. Downs Sack Rt. | 0.0% | 5.3% | 5.1% |
| Pass. Downs Sack Rt. | 5.9% | 13.3% | 6.6% |
| Turnovers | Georgia | Vanderbilt |
|---|---|---|
| Turnovers | 1 | 3 |
| Turnover Points (what's this?) | 5.9 | 20.2 |
| Turnover Margin | Georgia +2 | |
| Exp. TO Margin | Georgia +0.22 | |
| TO Luck (Margin vs. Exp. Margin) | Georgia +1.78 | |
| TO Points Margin | Georgia +14.4 points | |
| Situational | Georgia | Vanderbilt |
| Q1 S&P | 1.337 | 0.345 |
| Q2 S&P | 0.659 | 0.462 |
| Q3 S&P | 0.602 | 0.000 |
| Q4 S&P | 0.526 | 0.731 |
| 1st Down S&P | 0.605 | 0.559 |
| 2nd Down S&P | 0.661 | 0.426 |
| 3rd Down S&P | 0.575 | 0.521 |
| Projected Scoring Margin: Georgia by 16.2 | ||
| Actual Scoring Margin: Georgia by 17 | ||
It's pretty hard to pull off 89 snaps with a 24 percent success rate, but kudos to Vanderbilt for figuring out a way. So many possessions in this game were quick for reasons good or bad -- three of Georgia's five scores took 75 seconds or less (partially because two were returns), and four failed drives occupied under 2 minutes; VU on the other hand, was punting within two minutes on five occasions, scored once in 49 seconds, and threw picks three times within 90 seconds.
The result was a long, choppy game that Georgia controlled ... and that Georgia completely put away until late. There were 80 rushes, and it still lasted nearly four hours.
Georgia, I just need to see a little bit from your passing game to be sold on you. Nick Chubb's Nick Chubb, and the defense is looking great. But Greyson Lambert (11-for-21 with no completions of even 20 yards) still scares the hell out of me.