:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/40537742/456212372.0.jpg)
Georgia 35, Tennessee 32
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here.
| Basics | Georgia | Tennessee | Nat'l Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays | 78 | 78 | |
| Close Rate (non-garbage time) | 100.0% | ||
| Avg Starting FP | 28.8 | 28.4 | 29.8 |
| Possessions | 15 | 15 | |
| Scoring Opportunities* |
5 | 6 | |
| Points Per Opportunity | 5.60 | 5.17 | 4.72 |
| Leverage Rate** | 73.1% | 61.5% | 68.3% |
| Close S&P*** | 0.531 | 0.497 | 0.507 |
|
* A scoring opportunity occurs when an offense gets a first down inside the opponent's 40 (or scores from outside the 40). ** Leverage Rate = Standard Downs / (Standard Downs + Passing Downs) *** When using IsoPPP, the S&P formula is (0.8*Success Rate) + (0.2*IsoPPP) |
|||
| EqPts (what's this?) | Georgia | Tennessee | |
| Total | 26.9 | 27.7 | |
| Rushing | 18.9 | 8.1 | |
| Passing | 7.9 | 19.6 | |
| Success Rate (what's this?) | Georgia | Tennessee | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 48.7% | 39.7% | 42.1% |
| Rushing (close) | 54.0% | 45.2% | 43.4% |
| Passing (close) | 39.3% | 36.2% | 40.8% |
| Standard Downs | 54.4% | 47.9% | 47.5% |
| Passing Downs | 33.3% | 26.7% | 30.6% |
| IsoPPP (what's this?) | Georgia | Tennessee | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 0.71 | 0.89 | 0.85 |
| Rushing (close) | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.72 |
| Passing (close) | 0.72 | 1.15 | 0.99 |
| Standard Downs | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.77 |
| Passing Downs | 1.15 | 1.42 | 1.13 |
| Line Stats | Georgia | Tennessee | Nat'l Avg |
| Line Yards/Carry (what's this?) | 3.00 | 3.42 | 2.90 |
| Std. Downs Sack Rt. | 6.7% | 4.2% | 4.5% |
| Pass. Downs Sack Rt. | 15.4% | 8.7% | 7.3% |
| Turnovers | Georgia | Tennessee |
|---|---|---|
| Turnovers | 2 | 2 |
| Turnover Points (what's this?) | 5.2 | 10.5 |
| Turnover Margin | +0 | |
| Exp. TO Margin | Georgia +0.22 | |
| TO Luck (Margin vs. Exp. Margin) | Tennessee +0.22 | |
| TO Points Margin | Georgia +5.3 points | |
| Situational | Georgia | Tennessee |
| Q1 S&P | 0.464 | 0.504 |
| Q2 S&P | 0.666 | 0.551 |
| Q3 S&P | 0.301 | 0.430 |
| Q4 S&P | 0.577 | 0.547 |
| 1st Down S&P | 0.504 | 0.513 |
| 2nd Down S&P | 0.437 | 0.651 |
| 3rd Down S&P | 0.596 | 0.297 |
| Projected Scoring Margin: Georgia by 4.5 | ||
| Actual Scoring Margin: Georgia by 3 | ||
Field position: even. Finishing drives: basically even. Gains: basically even. Line play: mostly even. In the end, Georgia was more efficient, Tennessee's big plays were a little bigger (especially in the passing game, with which Georgia continues to lag behind), and Tennessee's turnovers were more costly (and fumbles in the end zone tend to be more costly).
That about sum it up? This was a confusing game to watch ... it almost seems stranget that the stats spell it out so clearly.