:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/40536544/456225738.0.jpg)
Stanford 20, Washington 13
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here.
| Basics | Stanford | Washington | Nat'l Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays | 66 | 71 | |
| Close Rate (non-garbage time) | 100.0% | ||
| Avg Starting FP | 28.6 | 25.3 | 29.8 |
| Possessions | 14 | 13 | |
| Scoring Opportunities* |
6 | 2 | |
| Points Per Opportunity | 3.33 | 3.50 | 4.72 |
| Leverage Rate** | 72.7% | 53.5% | 68.3% |
| Close S&P*** | 0.475 | 0.305 | 0.507 |
|
* A scoring opportunity occurs when an offense gets a first down inside the opponent's 40 (or scores from outside the 40). ** Leverage Rate = Standard Downs / (Standard Downs + Passing Downs) *** When using IsoPPP, the S&P formula is (0.8*Success Rate) + (0.2*IsoPPP) |
|||
| EqPts (what's this?) | Stanford | Washington | |
| Total | 20.0 | 9.6 | |
| Rushing | 10.2 | 5.2 | |
| Passing | 9.7 | 4.5 | |
| Success Rate (what's this?) | Stanford | Washington | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 40.9% | 23.9% | 42.1% |
| Rushing (close) | 33.3% | 27.0% | 43.4% |
| Passing (close) | 51.9% | 20.6% | 40.8% |
| Standard Downs | 47.9% | 34.2% | 47.5% |
| Passing Downs | 22.2% | 12.1% | 30.6% |
| IsoPPP (what's this?) | Stanford | Washington | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.85 |
| Rushing (close) | 0.79 | 0.52 | 0.72 |
| Passing (close) | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.99 |
| Standard Downs | 0.75 | 0.32 | 0.77 |
| Passing Downs | 0.68 | 1.35 | 1.13 |
| Line Stats | Stanford | Washington | Nat'l Avg |
| Line Yards/Carry (what's this?) | 3.58 | 2.59 | 2.90 |
| Std. Downs Sack Rt. | 5.6% | 7.7% | 4.5% |
| Pass. Downs Sack Rt. | 0.0% | 14.3% | 7.3% |
| Turnovers | Stanford | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Turnovers | 2 | 0 |
| Turnover Points (what's this?) | 14.7 | 0.0 |
| Turnover Margin | Washington +2 | |
| Exp. TO Margin | Washington +0.73 | |
| TO Luck (Margin vs. Exp. Margin) | Washington +1.27 | |
| TO Points Margin | Washington +14.7 points | |
| Situational | Stanford | Washington |
| Q1 S&P | 0.450 | 0.247 |
| Q2 S&P | 0.531 | 0.452 |
| Q3 S&P | 0.462 | 0.255 |
| Q4 S&P | 0.479 | 0.251 |
| 1st Down S&P | 0.508 | 0.313 |
| 2nd Down S&P | 0.438 | 0.114 |
| 3rd Down S&P | 0.500 | 0.434 |
| Projected Scoring Margin: Washington by 4.4 | ||
| Actual Scoring Margin: Stanford by 7 | ||
So Stanford loses the turnover battle, blows some more scoring opportunities and even cedes its field position advantage as the game progresses ... and completely shuts down Washington's offense in the second half and wins anyway. You're annoying me, Stanford.
Loading comments...