clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Study Hall: Ohio State 59, Wisconsin 0

New, 3 comments
Andy Lyons/Getty Images

Ohio State 59, Wisconsin 0

Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here.

Basics Ohio State Wisconsin Nat'l Avg
Total Plays 56 80
Close Rate (non-garbage time) 36.0%
Avg Starting FP 34.8 21.4 30.0
Possessions 13 15
Scoring Opportunities*
9 4
Points Per Opportunity 5.78 0.00 4.65
Leverage Rate** 76.9% 65.2% 68.3%
Close S&P*** 0.849 0.307 0.506
* A scoring opportunity occurs when an offense gets a first down inside the opponent's 40 (or scores from outside the 40).
** Leverage Rate = Standard Downs / (Standard Downs + Passing Downs)
*** When using IsoPPP, the S&P formula is (0.8*Success Rate) + (0.2*IsoPPP)
EqPts (what's this?) Ohio State Wisconsin
Total 42.7 10.1
Rushing 23.0 3.9
Passing 19.7 6.3
Success Rate (what's this?) Ohio State Wisconsin Nat'l Avg
All (close) 69.2% 30.4% 41.8%
Rushing (close) 57.1% 35.7% 43.2%
Passing (close) 83.3% 22.2% 40.3%
Standard Downs 75.0% 40.0% 47.0%
Passing Downs 50.0% 12.5% 30.6%
IsoPPP (what's this?) Ohio State Wisconsin Nat'l Avg
All (close) 1.48 0.32 0.86
Rushing (close) 1.42 0.32 0.74
Passing (close) 1.53 0.32 0.99
Standard Downs 1.63 0.34 0.77
Passing Downs 0.70 0.17 1.13
Line Stats Ohio State Wisconsin Nat'l Avg
Line Yards/Carry (what's this?) 3.64 3.02 2.92
Std. Downs Sack Rt. 0.0% 0.0% 4.7%
Pass. Downs Sack Rt. 0.0% 20.0% 7.7%
Turnovers Ohio State Wisconsin
Turnovers 0 4
Turnover Points (what's this?) 0.0 18.9
Turnover Margin Ohio State +4
Exp. TO Margin Ohio State +3
TO Luck (Margin vs. Exp. Margin) Ohio State +1
TO Points Margin Ohio State +18.9 points
Situational Ohio State Wisconsin
Q1 S&P 0.813 0.395
Q2 S&P 0.734 0.189
Q3 S&P 0.533 0.437
Q4 S&P 0.796 0.326
1st Down S&P 0.783 0.243
2nd Down S&P 0.807 0.367
3rd Down S&P 0.177 0.293
Projected Scoring Margin: Ohio State by 51.4
Actual Scoring Margin: Ohio State by 59

Chin up, Badger fans! Take turnovers out of the equation, and you should have only lost by about 40! And going by scoring opportunities created, you should have only lost by about 23!

So Ohio State seems to get better every time it loses a quarterback. Who's after Cardale Jones?