:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/43844552/20141108_sng_ah2_266.JPG.0.jpg)
Florida 34, Vanderbilt 10
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here.
| Basics | Florida | Vanderbilt | Nat'l Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays | 72 | 69 | |
| Close Rate (non-garbage time) | 73.8% | ||
| Avg Starting FP | 36.1 | 20.3 | 29.9 |
| Possessions | 14 | 13 | |
| Scoring Opportunities* |
7 | 4 | |
| Points Per Opportunity | 4.86 | 2.50 | 4.69 |
| Leverage Rate** | 66.1% | 64.3% | 68.2% |
| Close S&P*** | 0.538 | 0.392 | 0.505 |
|
* A scoring opportunity occurs when an offense gets a first down inside the opponent's 40 (or scores from outside the 40). ** Leverage Rate = Standard Downs / (Standard Downs + Passing Downs) *** When using IsoPPP, the S&P formula is (0.8*Success Rate) + (0.2*IsoPPP) |
|||
| EqPts (what's this?) | Florida | Vanderbilt | |
| Total | 28.6 | 14.3 | |
| Rushing | 17.3 | 1.5 | |
| Passing | 11.4 | 12.8 | |
| Success Rate (what's this?) | Florida | Vanderbilt | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 38.7% | 35.7% | 41.9% |
| Rushing (close) | 35.9% | 40.9% | 43.5% |
| Passing (close) | 43.5% | 30.0% | 40.2% |
| Standard Downs | 31.7% | 48.2% | 47.1% |
| Passing Downs | 52.4% | 13.3% | 30.6% |
| IsoPPP (what's this?) | Florida | Vanderbilt | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 1.14 | 0.53 | 0.85 |
| Rushing (close) | 1.14 | 0.27 | 0.73 |
| Passing (close) | 1.14 | 0.92 | 0.98 |
| Standard Downs | 1.04 | 0.55 | 0.77 |
| Passing Downs | 1.26 | 0.44 | 1.13 |
| Line Stats | Florida | Vanderbilt | Nat'l Avg |
| Line Yards/Carry (what's this?) | 2.85 | 2.65 | 2.92 |
| Std. Downs Sack Rt. | 8.3% | 0.0% | 4.7% |
| Pass. Downs Sack Rt. | 9.1% | 0.0% | 7.6% |
| Turnovers | Florida | Vanderbilt |
|---|---|---|
| Turnovers | 0 | 4 |
| Turnover Points (what's this?) | 0.0 | 17.1 |
| Turnover Margin | Florida +4 | |
| Exp. TO Margin | Florida +1.61 | |
| TO Luck (Margin vs. Exp. Margin) | Florida +2.39 | |
| TO Points Margin | Florida +17.1 points | |
| Situational | Florida | Vanderbilt |
| Q1 S&P | 0.585 | 0.577 |
| Q2 S&P | 0.468 | 0.163 |
| Q3 S&P | 0.486 | 0.264 |
| Q4 S&P | 0.577 | 0.423 |
| 1st Down S&P | 0.493 | 0.447 |
| 2nd Down S&P | 0.551 | 0.407 |
| 3rd Down S&P | 0.499 | 0.283 |
| Projected Scoring Margin: Florida by 31.4 | ||
| Actual Scoring Margin: Florida by 24 | ||
Florida' still a very, very limited team, but if you allow the Gators to drastically tilt the field in their favor, and if you don't capitalize on the socring opportunities you get, they're still more than talented enough to thump you. This game was mostly even from an efficiency standpoint, with Vanderbilt doing better on standard downs and Florida bailing itself on passing downs (Treon Harris was allowed to pass in this game!), but Florida's big plays were infinitely bigger, and the game was played on the Gators' terms.