:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/41208304/456659146.0.jpg)
Georgia Tech 28, Miami 17
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here.
| Basics | Georgia Tech | Miami | Nat'l Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays | 72 | 44 | |
| Close Rate (non-garbage time) | 100.0% | ||
| Avg Starting FP | 26.1 | 21.5 | 29.7 |
| Possessions | 8 | 8 | |
| Scoring Opportunities* |
4 | 5 | |
| Points Per Opportunity | 7.00 | 3.40 | 4.69 |
| Leverage Rate** | 79.2% | 77.3% | 68.4% |
| Close S&P*** | 0.541 | 0.599 | 0.508 |
|
* A scoring opportunity occurs when an offense gets a first down inside the opponent's 40 (or scores from outside the 40). ** Leverage Rate = Standard Downs / (Standard Downs + Passing Downs) *** When using IsoPPP, the S&P formula is (0.8*Success Rate) + (0.2*IsoPPP) |
|||
| EqPts (what's this?) | Georgia Tech | Miami | |
| Total | 25.4 | 20.8 | |
| Rushing | 23.4 | 7.7 | |
| Passing | 2.0 | 13.2 | |
| Success Rate (what's this?) | Georgia Tech | Miami | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 50.0% | 52.3% | 42.2% |
| Rushing (close) | 51.6% | 52.9% | 43.6% |
| Passing (close) | 37.5% | 51.9% | 40.7% |
| Standard Downs | 52.6% | 58.8% | 47.5% |
| Passing Downs | 40.0% | 30.0% | 30.7% |
| IsoPPP (what's this?) | Georgia Tech | Miami | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 0.71 | 0.91 | 0.85 |
| Rushing (close) | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.73 |
| Passing (close) | 0.67 | 0.94 | 0.99 |
| Standard Downs | 0.73 | 0.96 | 0.77 |
| Passing Downs | 0.56 | 0.56 | 1.14 |
| Line Stats | Georgia Tech | Miami | Nat'l Avg |
| Line Yards/Carry (what's this?) | 3.80 | 4.19 | 2.93 |
| Std. Downs Sack Rt. | 0.0% | 5.3% | 4.7% |
| Pass. Downs Sack Rt. | 16.7% | 12.5% | 7.3% |
| Turnovers | Georgia Tech | Miami |
|---|---|---|
| Turnovers | 0 | 2 |
| Turnover Points (what's this?) | 0.0 | 10.3 |
| Turnover Margin | Georgia Tech +2 | |
| Exp. TO Margin | Georgia Tech +1.32 | |
| TO Luck (Margin vs. Exp. Margin) | Georgia Tech +0.68 | |
| TO Points Margin | Georgia Tech +10.3 points | |
| Situational | Georgia Tech | Miami |
| Q1 S&P | 0.620 | 0.789 |
| Q2 S&P | 0.528 | 0.472 |
| Q3 S&P | 0.550 | 0.574 |
| Q4 S&P | 0.490 | 0.514 |
| 1st Down S&P | 0.448 | 0.686 |
| 2nd Down S&P | 0.515 | 0.539 |
| 3rd Down S&P | 0.686 | 0.263 |
| Projected Scoring Margin: Georgia Tech by 14.9 | ||
| Actual Scoring Margin: Georgia Tech by 11 | ||
Teams had eight possessions in this game, and one for each team was an end-of-half kneeldown. So basically seven each. How crazy is that? Washington State had five possessions in the third quarter against California. And when you only get seven chances to score, blowing two scoring opportunities on interceptions (as Miami did) feels more like blowing four opportunities.