:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/42905462/457745042.0.jpg)
Miami 30, Virginia Tech 6
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here.
| Basics | Miami | Virginia Tech | Nat'l Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays | 69 | 59 | |
| Close Rate (non-garbage time) | 46.9% | ||
| Avg Starting FP | 31.2 | 21.6 | 29.8 |
| Possessions | 12 | 11 | |
| Scoring Opportunities* |
7 | 3 | |
| Points Per Opportunity | 4.43 | 2.33 | 4.70 |
| Leverage Rate** | 43.5% | 18.6% | 68.2% |
| Close S&P*** | 0.573 | 0.218 | 0.506 |
|
* A scoring opportunity occurs when an offense gets a first down inside the opponent's 40 (or scores from outside the 40). ** Leverage Rate = Standard Downs / (Standard Downs + Passing Downs) *** When using IsoPPP, the S&P formula is (0.8*Success Rate) + (0.2*IsoPPP) |
|||
| EqPts (what's this?) | Miami | Virginia Tech | |
| Total | 30.3 | 13.5 | |
| Rushing | 23.8 | 7.1 | |
| Passing | 6.5 | 6.3 | |
| Success Rate (what's this?) | Miami | Virginia Tech | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 47.5% | 20.0% | 41.9% |
| Rushing (close) | 51.7% | 16.7% | 43.4% |
| Passing (close) | 36.4% | 21.4% | 40.3% |
| Standard Downs | 53.3% | 27.3% | 47.1% |
| Passing Downs | 30.0% | 11.1% | 30.6% |
| IsoPPP (what's this?) | Miami | Virginia Tech | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 0.97 | 0.29 | 0.85 |
| Rushing (close) | 0.81 | 0.37 | 0.73 |
| Passing (close) | 1.56 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Standard Downs | 1.05 | 0.29 | 0.77 |
| Passing Downs | 0.52 | 0.30 | 1.14 |
| Line Stats | Miami | Virginia Tech | Nat'l Avg |
| Line Yards/Carry (what's this?) | 3.48 | 1.17 | 2.92 |
| Std. Downs Sack Rt. | 0.0% | 0.0% | 4.7% |
| Pass. Downs Sack Rt. | 0.0% | 22.2% | 7.5% |
| Turnovers | Miami | Virginia Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Turnovers | 0 | 3 |
| Turnover Points (what's this?) | 0.0 | 15.3 |
| Turnover Margin | Miami +3 | |
| Exp. TO Margin | Miami +1.97 | |
| TO Luck (Margin vs. Exp. Margin) | Miami +1.03 | |
| TO Points Margin | Miami +15.3 points | |
| Situational | Miami | Virginia Tech |
| Q1 S&P | 0.502 | 0.326 |
| Q2 S&P | 0.639 | 0.220 |
| Q3 S&P | 0.454 | 0.559 |
| Q4 S&P | 0.639 | 0.538 |
| 1st Down S&P | 0.645 | 0.478 |
| 2nd Down S&P | 0.498 | 0.447 |
| 3rd Down S&P | 0.505 | 0.231 |
| Projected Scoring Margin: Miami by 32.1 | ||
| Actual Scoring Margin: Miami by 24 | ||
Start 10 yards further up the field, finish drives twice as well, play two and a half times more efficiently, prevent any and all big plays, win the turnovers battle handily.
Damn, it's a wonder Miami didn't win by more than 24.
Miami's up to 16th in the F/+ rankings. That might not be a fluke. When the 'Canes get out of their own way (and they're doing a better job of that of late), they're pretty dangerous.
Loading comments...