:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/42399696/20141018_ajw_sg8_388.JPG.0.jpg)
Alabama 59, Texas A&M 0
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here.
| Basics | Alabama | Texas A&M | Nat'l Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays | 80 | 55 | |
| Close Rate (non-garbage time) | 44.4% | ||
| Avg Starting FP | 32.7 | 26.1 | 29.8 |
| Possessions | 13 | 14 | |
| Scoring Opportunities* |
9 | 3 | |
| Points Per Opportunity | 6.56 | 0.00 | 4.69 |
| Leverage Rate** | 43.8% | 18.2% | 68.3% |
| Close S&P*** | 0.685 | 0.259 | 0.506 |
|
* A scoring opportunity occurs when an offense gets a first down inside the opponent's 40 (or scores from outside the 40). ** Leverage Rate = Standard Downs / (Standard Downs + Passing Downs) *** When using IsoPPP, the S&P formula is (0.8*Success Rate) + (0.2*IsoPPP) |
|||
| EqPts (what's this?) | Alabama | Texas A&M | |
| Total | 45.9 | 7.0 | |
| Rushing | 23.0 | 2.5 | |
| Passing | 22.9 | 4.4 | |
| Success Rate (what's this?) | Alabama | Texas A&M | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 62.2% | 13.3% | 42.0% |
| Rushing (close) | 77.3% | 0.0% | 43.5% |
| Passing (close) | 47.8% | 20.0% | 40.4% |
| Standard Downs | 60.0% | 10.0% | 47.3% |
| Passing Downs | 70.0% | 20.0% | 30.5% |
| IsoPPP (what's this?) | Alabama | Texas A&M | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 0.93 | 0.76 | 0.85 |
| Rushing (close) | 1.13 | N/A | 0.73 |
| Passing (close) | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.99 |
| Standard Downs | 1.07 | 0.73 | 0.77 |
| Passing Downs | 0.53 | 0.80 | 1.14 |
| Line Stats | Alabama | Texas A&M | Nat'l Avg |
| Line Yards/Carry (what's this?) | 4.91 | 1.72 | 2.93 |
| Std. Downs Sack Rt. | 0.0% | 16.7% | 4.7% |
| Pass. Downs Sack Rt. | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.4% |
| Turnovers | Alabama | Texas A&M |
|---|---|---|
| Turnovers | 0 | 1 |
| Turnover Points (what's this?) | 0.0 | 4.9 |
| Turnover Margin | Alabama +1 | |
| Exp. TO Margin | Alabama +0.73 | |
| TO Luck (Margin vs. Exp. Margin) | Alabama +0.27 | |
| TO Points Margin | Alabama +4.9 points | |
| Situational | Alabama | Texas A&M |
| Q1 S&P | 0.679 | N/A |
| Q2 S&P | 0.752 | 0.257 |
| Q3 S&P | 0.607 | 0.394 |
| Q4 S&P | 0.509 | N/A |
| 1st Down S&P | 0.659 | 0.297 |
| 2nd Down S&P | 0.628 | 0.297 |
| 3rd Down S&P | 0.645 | 0.318 |
| Projected Scoring Margin: Alabama by 43.8 | ||
| Actual Scoring Margin: Alabama by 59 | ||
The scariest part here: there was only one turnover. So we can't even say "Well, it was really more like a 42-point win than a 59-point win because turnovers luck" or something. This was as thorough as a 59-point win can be, and ... well, 59-point wins are pretty thorough.
The second-scariest part: A&M had a 0.0% success rate running the ball in non-garbage time and had a 0.0% success rate in the first quarter. Alabama was angry.
Loading comments...