:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/42387136/20141018_gma_ad8_167.jpg.0.jpg)
Ole Miss 34, Tennessee 3
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here.
| Basics | Ole Miss | Tennessee | Nat'l Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Plays | 78 | 62 | |
| Close Rate (non-garbage time) | 78.6% | ||
| Avg Starting FP | 31.0 | 28.7 | 29.8 |
| Possessions | 16 | 15 | |
| Scoring Opportunities* |
6 | 3 | |
| Points Per Opportunity | 5.67 | 1.00 | 4.69 |
| Leverage Rate** | 42.3% | 45.2% | 68.3% |
| Close S&P*** | 0.466 | 0.303 | 0.506 |
|
* A scoring opportunity occurs when an offense gets a first down inside the opponent's 40 (or scores from outside the 40). ** Leverage Rate = Standard Downs / (Standard Downs + Passing Downs) *** When using IsoPPP, the S&P formula is (0.8*Success Rate) + (0.2*IsoPPP) |
|||
| EqPts (what's this?) | Ole Miss | Tennessee | |
| Total | 26.7 | 8.0 | |
| Rushing | 14.4 | 1.7 | |
| Passing | 12.3 | 6.2 | |
| Success Rate (what's this?) | Ole Miss | Tennessee | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 28.6% | 24.1% | 42.0% |
| Rushing (close) | 28.0% | 25.0% | 43.5% |
| Passing (close) | 29.0% | 23.7% | 40.4% |
| Standard Downs | 39.4% | 28.6% | 47.3% |
| Passing Downs | 13.0% | 19.2% | 30.5% |
| IsoPPP (what's this?) | Ole Miss | Tennessee | Nat'l Avg |
| All (close) | 1.19 | 0.55 | 0.85 |
| Rushing (close) | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.73 |
| Passing (close) | 1.29 | 0.63 | 0.99 |
| Standard Downs | 1.32 | 0.25 | 0.77 |
| Passing Downs | 0.61 | 1.03 | 1.14 |
| Line Stats | Ole Miss | Tennessee | Nat'l Avg |
| Line Yards/Carry (what's this?) | 2.23 | 1.02 | 2.93 |
| Std. Downs Sack Rt. | 9.1% | 16.7% | 4.7% |
| Pass. Downs Sack Rt. | 15.0% | 20.0% | 7.4% |
| Turnovers | Ole Miss | Tennessee |
|---|---|---|
| Turnovers | 0 | 4 |
| Turnover Points (what's this?) | 0.0 | 12.8 |
| Turnover Margin | Ole Miss +4 | |
| Exp. TO Margin | Ole Miss +1.75 | |
| TO Luck (Margin vs. Exp. Margin) | Ole Miss +2.25 | |
| TO Points Margin | Ole Miss +12.8 points | |
| Situational | Ole Miss | Tennessee |
| Q1 S&P | 0.229 | 0.362 |
| Q2 S&P | 0.599 | 0.407 |
| Q3 S&P | 0.529 | 0.330 |
| Q4 S&P | 0.541 | 0.258 |
| 1st Down S&P | 0.600 | 0.252 |
| 2nd Down S&P | 0.345 | 0.317 |
| 3rd Down S&P | 0.399 | 0.382 |
| Projected Scoring Margin: Ole Miss by 31.6 | ||
| Actual Scoring Margin: Ole Miss by 31 | ||
Like Nebraska-Northwestern, this was an eventual blowout. Unlike Nebraska-Northwestern, the blowout victim really never pretended to have a chance. Tennessee's defense showed well -- have you noticed the Vols are up to 10th in Def. F/+ http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/fplus2014? -- but holy smokes, Ole Miss' defense is just on a different level at this point. Put that unit up against Tennessee's offense, and ... yeah.