:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/24484699/20131130_jla_sc5_674.0.jpg)
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here. Or just skip to the words. I won't be offended. (Okay, I'll only be a little offended.)
Kudos to Notre Dame and Tommy Rees for coming up with a few pretty big plays on passing downs against this stout defense. The problem, of course, was that the Irish faced far too many passing downs to survive.
Stanford 27, Notre Dame 20 |
||||||
| Notre Dame | Stanford | Notre Dame | Stanford | |||
| Close % | 100.0% | STANDARD DOWNS | ||||
| Field Position % | 44.8% | 40.6% | Success Rate | 38.7% | 61.2% | |
| Leverage % | 53.4% | 71.0% | PPP | 0.33 | 0.51 | |
| S&P | 0.713 | 1.120 | ||||
| TOTAL | ||||||
| EqPts | 25.2 | 39.5 | PASSING DOWNS | |||
| Close Success Rate | 36.2% | 55.1% | Success Rate | 33.3% | 40.0% | |
| Close PPP | 0.43 | 0.57 | PPP | 0.56 | 0.73 | |
| Close S&P | 0.796 | 1.124 | S&P | 0.892 | 1.132 | |
| RUSHING | TURNOVERS | |||||
| EqPts | 6.6 | 25.4 | Number | 2 | 2 | |
| Close Success Rate | 26.1% | 52.0% | Turnover Pts | 8.2 | 4.6 | |
| Close PPP | 0.29 | 0.51 | Turnover Pts Margin | -3.6 | +3.6 | |
| Close S&P | 0.548 | 1.029 | ||||
| Line Yards/carry | 2.03 | 3.63 | Q1 S&P | 0.681 | 1.770 | |
| Q2 S&P | 0.720 | 0.919 | ||||
| PASSING | Q3 S&P | 1.270 | 1.386 | |||
| EqPts | 18.6 | 14.1 | Q4 S&P | 0.422 | 0.662 | |
| Close Success Rate | 42.9% | 63.2% | ||||
| Close PPP | 0.53 | 0.74 | 1st Down S&P | 0.574 | 0.985 | |
| Close S&P | 0.960 | 1.374 | 2nd Down S&P | 0.875 | 1.187 | |
| SD/PD Sack Rate | 0.0% / 5.9% | 6.7% / 0.0% | 3rd Down S&P | 1.146 | 1.318 | |
| Projected Pt. Margin: Stanford +17.9 | Actual Pt. Margin: Stanford +7 | ||||||