/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/24484645/20131130_jla_al2_965.0.jpg)
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here. Or just skip to the words. I won't be offended. (Okay, I'll only be a little offended.)
Average Starting Field Position: UCLA 40, USC 20.
That pretty much spells out the winner of the game. UCLA won with field position and a little more explosiveness ... and won by a lot because of turnovers.
UCLA 35, USC 14 |
||||||
UCLA | USC | UCLA | USC | |||
Close % | 94.8% | STANDARD DOWNS | ||||
Field Position % | 58.6% | 26.6% | Success Rate | 48.9% | 52.5% | |
Leverage % | 70.1% | 66.7% | PPP | 0.62 | 0.40 | |
S&P | 1.112 | 0.929 | ||||
TOTAL | ||||||
EqPts | 39.3 | 27.2 | PASSING DOWNS | |||
Close Success Rate | 46.3% | 46.7% | Success Rate | 40.0% | 35.0% | |
Close PPP | 0.57 | 0.44 | PPP | 0.46 | 0.52 | |
Close S&P | 1.036 | 0.910 | S&P | 0.856 | 0.872 | |
RUSHING | TURNOVERS | |||||
EqPts | 20.6 | 15.5 | Number | 0 | 2 | |
Close Success Rate | 47.4% | 51.7% | Turnover Pts | 0.0 | 9.7 | |
Close PPP | 0.52 | 0.53 | Turnover Pts Margin | +9.7 | -9.7 | |
Close S&P | 0.990 | 1.051 | ||||
Line Yards/carry | 3.79 | 4.04 | Q1 S&P | 0.910 | 0.722 | |
Q2 S&P | 1.084 | 0.891 | ||||
PASSING | Q3 S&P | 1.303 | 1.237 | |||
EqPts | 18.8 | 11.7 | Q4 S&P | 0.830 | 0.557 | |
Close Success Rate | 44.8% | 41.9% | ||||
Close PPP | 0.65 | 0.36 | 1st Down S&P | 0.932 | 0.893 | |
Close S&P | 1.095 | 0.778 | 2nd Down S&P | 0.973 | 0.826 | |
SD/PD Sack Rate | 0.0% / 15.4% | 17.7% / 14.3% | 3rd Down S&P | 1.412 | 0.923 | |
Projected Pt. Margin: UCLA +21.9 | Actual Pt. Margin: UCLA +21 |