/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/24476893/452675195.0.jpg)
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here. Or just skip to the words. I won't be offended. (Okay, I'll only be a little offended.)
If you had told me South Carolina would be +6 (and +21.6 points) in turnovers and recover all five of the game's fumbles, I'd have assumed the Gamecocks would have won by about 38 points. Instead, they needed almost every single one of those turnovers to survive. But they did indeed survive.
South Carolina 31, Clemson 17 |
||||||
Clemson | SC | Clemson | SC | |||
Close % | 100.0% | STANDARD DOWNS | ||||
Field Position % | 36.8% | 55.1% | Success Rate | 55.3% | 36.7% | |
Leverage % | 66.7% | 62.8% | PPP | 0.61 | 0.33 | |
S&P | 1.159 | 0.694 | ||||
TOTAL | ||||||
EqPts | 31.4 | 31.7 | PASSING DOWNS | |||
Close Success Rate | 47.4% | 37.2% | Success Rate | 31.6% | 37.9% | |
Close PPP | 0.55 | 0.41 | PPP | 0.44 | 0.54 | |
Close S&P | 1.025 | 0.779 | S&P | 0.758 | 0.922 | |
RUSHING | TURNOVERS | |||||
EqPts | 16.0 | 15.6 | Number | 6 | 0 | |
Close Success Rate | 58.3% | 35.4% | Turnover Pts | 21.6 | 0.0 | |
Close PPP | 0.66 | 0.32 | Turnover Pts Margin | -21.6 | +21.6 | |
Close S&P | 1.248 | 0.679 | ||||
Line Yards/carry | 4.27 | 2.49 | Q1 S&P | 1.753 | 0.972 | |
Q2 S&P | 0.646 | 0.666 | ||||
PASSING | Q3 S&P | 1.013 | 0.615 | |||
EqPts | 15.5 | 16.2 | Q4 S&P | 0.882 | 0.780 | |
Close Success Rate | 39.4% | 40.0% | ||||
Close PPP | 0.47 | 0.54 | 1st Down S&P | 0.920 | 0.653 | |
Close S&P | 0.863 | 0.938 | 2nd Down S&P | 0.979 | 0.619 | |
SD/PD Sack Rate | 15.8% / 14.3% | 6.3% / 7.1% | 3rd Down S&P | 1.362 | 1.251 | |
Projected Pt. Margin: South Carolina +21.8 | Actual Pt. Margin: South Carolina +14 |
Loading comments...