/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/22614585/20131102_ajw_aj5_412.0.jpg)
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here. Or just skip to the words. I won't be offended. (Okay, I'll only be a little offended.)
Remember how symmetrical the Auburn-Arkansas game was, how perfectly the projected and actual scoring margins were? Yeah, this game was the opposite.
As far as I can tell, here's the difference-maker:
Trips inside the 40: OSU 9, Tech 9 (including pick six)
Points per trip: OSU 5.8, Tech 3.8
In nine trips, OSU scored seven touchdowns, kicked a field goal, and threw a pick. Meanwhile, Tech scored four touchdowns (three sans the pick six), kicked two field goals, threw a pick, and turned the ball over on downs twice. There is still value in actually punching the ball into the end zone.
Oklahoma State 52, Texas Tech 34 |
||||||
OSU | Tech | OSU | Tech | |||
Close % | 80.1% | STANDARD DOWNS | ||||
Field Position % | 47.2% | 51.6% | Success Rate | 46.6% | 47.9% | |
Leverage % | 71.6% | 70.6% | PPP | 0.38 | 0.60 | |
S&P | 0.846 | 1.075 | ||||
TOTAL | ||||||
EqPts | 47.5 | 51.7 | PASSING DOWNS | |||
Close Success Rate | 49.4% | 47.1% | Success Rate | 56.5% | 45.0% | |
Close PPP | 0.58 | 0.61 | PPP | 1.09 | 0.65 | |
Close S&P | 1.075 | 1.083 | S&P | 1.652 | 1.103 | |
RUSHING | TURNOVERS | |||||
EqPts | 27.2 | 13.1 | Number | 2 | 3 | |
Close Success Rate | 51.1% | 43.8% | Turnover Pts | 11.9 | 12.3 | |
Close PPP | 0.57 | 0.47 | Turnover Pts Margin | +0.4 | -0.4 | |
Close S&P | 1.081 | 0.908 | ||||
Line Yards/carry | 3.20 | 3.14 | Q1 S&P | 1.138 | 0.929 | |
Q2 S&P | 0.859 | 1.310 | ||||
PASSING | Q3 S&P | 1.237 | 1.015 | |||
EqPts | 20.3 | 38.7 | Q4 S&P | 0.463 | 0.693 | |
Close Success Rate | 47.1% | 48.1% | ||||
Close PPP | 0.60 | 0.66 | 1st Down S&P | 0.798 | 1.040 | |
Close S&P | 1.067 | 1.137 | 2nd Down S&P | 1.214 | 1.102 | |
SD/PD Sack Rate | 0.0% / 0.0% | 0.0% / 0.0% | 3rd Down S&P | 0.940 | 0.579 | |
Projected Pt. Margin: Texas Tech +3.8 | Actual Pt. Margin: Oklahoma State +18 |