:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/24015035/451625465.0.jpg)
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here. Or just skip to the words. I won't be offended. (Okay, I'll only be a little offended.)
The equivalent point value of Baylor's two goal line fumbles: 18.0 points. So basically, two plays transformed a comfortable, decisive OSU win into a laughable rout. But ... it was still going to be a comfortable, decisive OSU win. When your opponent's success rate almost doubles yours, you're the one that needs the humongous turnovers to survive.
Oklahoma State 49, Baylor 17 |
||||||
| Baylor | OSU | Baylor | OSU | |||
| Close % | 56.7% | STANDARD DOWNS | ||||
| Field Position % | 45.2% | 30.1% | Success Rate | 39.3% | 62.2% | |
| Leverage % | 65.1% | 80.4% | PPP | 0.56 | 0.82 | |
| S&P | 0.948 | 1.444 | ||||
| TOTAL | ||||||
| EqPts | 42.1 | 54.9 | PASSING DOWNS | |||
| Close Success Rate | 32.6% | 60.9% | Success Rate | 20.0% | 55.6% | |
| Close PPP | 0.43 | 0.85 | PPP | 0.20 | 0.99 | |
| Close S&P | 0.756 | 1.464 | S&P | 0.398 | 1.543 | |
| RUSHING | TURNOVERS | |||||
| EqPts | 9.9 | 14.9 | Number | 3 | 0 | |
| Close Success Rate | 31.6% | 55.6% | Turnover Pts | 21.9 | 0.0 | |
| Close PPP | 0.34 | 0.24 | Turnover Pts Margin | -21.9 | +21.9 | |
| Close S&P | 0.651 | 0.791 | ||||
| Line Yards/carry | 1.75 | 2.08 | Q1 S&P | 0.836 | 1.477 | |
| Q2 S&P | 0.700 | 1.069 | ||||
| PASSING | Q3 S&P | 0.743 | 1.503 | |||
| EqPts | 32.2 | 40.1 | Q4 S&P | 1.287 | 0.776 | |
| Close Success Rate | 33.3% | 68.4% | ||||
| Close PPP | 0.51 | 1.74 | 1st Down S&P | 1.109 | 1.282 | |
| Close S&P | 0.839 | 2.420 | 2nd Down S&P | 0.643 | 0.881 | |
| SD/PD Sack Rate | 0.0% / 9.1% | 8.3% / 0.0% | 3rd Down S&P | 0.837 | 1.719 | |
| Projected Pt. Margin: Oklahoma State +34.7 | Actual Pt. Margin: Oklahoma State +32 | ||||||