:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/21651315/185381633.0.jpg)
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here. Or just skip to the words. I won't be offended. (Okay, I'll only be a little offended.)
Clemson's not an elite team. I've said that before. But the Tigers aren't mediocre either. FSU has made mediocre teams look like cupcakes in 2013, and on Saturday, they made a good team look mediocre at best. This is a gooooood team, but you probably already knew that by now.
And just imagine how many points FSU could have scored if it actually avoided passing downs. Clemson handled the run pretty well. And gave up 51 points.
Florida State 51, Clemson 14 |
||||||
| FSU | Clemson | FSU | Clemson | |||
| Close % | 53.8% | STANDARD DOWNS | ||||
| Field Position % | 54.2% | 46.5% | Success Rate | 39.3% | 44.0% | |
| Leverage % | 60.9% | 64.1% | PPP | 0.47 | 0.28 | |
| S&P | 0.868 | 0.719 | ||||
| TOTAL | ||||||
| EqPts | 54.0 | 29.9 | PASSING DOWNS | |||
| Close Success Rate | 50.0% | 41.0% | Success Rate | 66.7% | 35.7% | |
| Close PPP | 0.73 | 0.33 | PPP | 1.14 | 0.43 | |
| Close S&P | 1.234 | 0.744 | S&P | 1.804 | 0.788 | |
| RUSHING | TURNOVERS | |||||
| EqPts | 13.3 | 14.4 | Number | 1 | 4 | |
| Close Success Rate | 47.4% | 50.0% | Turnover Pts | 6.2 | 20.7 | |
| Close PPP | 0.35 | 0.41 | Turnover Pts Margin | +14.6 | -14.6 | |
| Close S&P | 0.824 | 0.909 | ||||
| Line Yards/carry | 2.64 | 3.05 | Q1 S&P | 1.219 | 0.804 | |
| Q2 S&P | 1.285 | 0.667 | ||||
| PASSING | Q3 S&P | 1.077 | 0.580 | |||
| EqPts | 40.7 | 15.5 | Q4 S&P | 1.619 | 0.841 | |
| Close Success Rate | 51.9% | 36.0% | ||||
| Close PPP | 1.00 | 0.29 | 1st Down S&P | 0.839 | 0.682 | |
| Close S&P | 1.522 | 0.652 | 2nd Down S&P | 1.665 | 0.802 | |
| SD/PD Sack Rate | 8.3% / 0.0% | 7.7% / 0.0% | 3rd Down S&P | 1.514 | 0.700 | |
| Projected Pt. Margin: Florida State +38.7 | Actual Pt. Margin: Florida State +37 | ||||||
Loading comments...