:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/21261419/184245566.0.jpg)
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here. Or just skip to the words. I won't be offended. (Okay, I'll only be a little offended.)
I mean, this is about as even a box score as you'll see. Stanford had a little more big-play success, but Utah converted a few more passing downs. Great win for a team that might be pretty damn good.
Utah 27, Stanford 21 |
||||||
| Stanford | Utah | Stanford | Utah | |||
| Close % | 100.0% | STANDARD DOWNS | ||||
| Field Position % | 37.5% | 42.5% | Success Rate | 44.7% | 46.7% | |
| Leverage % | 67.9% | 61.6% | PPP | 0.56 | 0.43 | |
| S&P | 1.012 | 0.896 | ||||
| TOTAL | ||||||
| EqPts | 34.8 | 38.2 | PASSING DOWNS | |||
| Close Success Rate | 41.1% | 45.2% | Success Rate | 33.3% | 42.9% | |
| Close PPP | 0.62 | 0.52 | PPP | 0.74 | 0.67 | |
| Close S&P | 1.032 | 0.975 | S&P | 1.076 | 1.101 | |
| RUSHING | TURNOVERS | |||||
| EqPts | 12.2 | 17.3 | Number | 2 | 1 | |
| Close Success Rate | 44.4% | 47.4% | Turnover Pts | 11.8 | 12.1 | |
| Close PPP | 0.45 | 0.46 | Turnover Pts Margin | +0.3 | -0.3 | |
| Close S&P | 0.898 | 0.929 | ||||
| Line Yards/carry | 3.52 | 2.86 | Q1 S&P | 1.608 | 1.282 | |
| Q2 S&P | 0.696 | 0.880 | ||||
| PASSING | Q3 S&P | 0.792 | 1.056 | |||
| EqPts | 22.6 | 20.9 | Q4 S&P | 0.983 | 0.341 | |
| Close Success Rate | 37.9% | 42.9% | ||||
| Close PPP | 0.78 | 0.60 | 1st Down S&P | 1.029 | 0.912 | |
| Close S&P | 1.158 | 1.025 | 2nd Down S&P | 0.896 | 0.991 | |
| SD/PD Sack Rate | 5.9% / 8.3% | 5.3% / 0.0% | 3rd Down S&P | 1.317 | 1.055 | |
| Projected Pt. Margin: Utah +3.1 | Actual Pt. Margin: Utah +6 | ||||||
Loading comments...