:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/20494945/182263897.0.jpg)
Confused? Visit the Advanced Stats glossary here. Or just skip to the words. I won't be offended. (Okay, I'll only be a little offended.)
Alabama 25, Ole Miss 0 |
||||||
| Alabama | Ole Miss | Alabama | Ole Miss | |||
| Close % | 90.7% | STANDARD DOWNS | ||||
| Field Position % | 34.7% | 31.6% | Success Rate | 51.2% | 28.1% | |
| Leverage % | 64.1% | 60.4% | PPP | 0.48 | 0.38 | |
| S&P | 0.993 | 0.663 | ||||
| TOTAL | ||||||
| EqPts | 39.1 | 18.8 | PASSING DOWNS | |||
| Close Success Rate | 40.6% | 30.2% | Success Rate | 21.7% | 33.3% | |
| Close PPP | 0.48 | 0.36 | PPP | 0.47 | 0.33 | |
| Close S&P | 0.885 | 0.663 | S&P | 0.692 | 0.662 | |
| RUSHING | TURNOVERS | |||||
| EqPts | 24.3 | 7.3 | Number | 1 | 2 | |
| Close Success Rate | 38.7% | 28.6% | Turnover Pts | 4.7 | 8.1 | |
| Close PPP | 0.51 | 0.34 | Turnover Pts Margin | +3.4 | -3.4 | |
| Close S&P | 0.898 | 0.623 | ||||
| Line Yards/carry | 2.51 | 2.68 | Q1 S&P | 0.757 | 0.920 | |
| Q2 S&P | 0.869 | 0.463 | ||||
| PASSING | Q3 S&P | 1.281 | 0.803 | |||
| EqPts | 14.8 | 11.5 | Q4 S&P | 0.989 | 0.324 | |
| Close Success Rate | 42.4% | 31.3% | ||||
| Close PPP | 0.45 | 0.38 | 1st Down S&P | 0.629 | 0.886 | |
| Close S&P | 0.872 | 0.689 | 2nd Down S&P | 0.626 | 1.061 | |
| SD/PD Sack Rate | 5.3% / 0.0% | 0.0% / 5.9% | 3rd Down S&P | 0.616 | 0.987 | |
| Projected Pt. Margin: Alabama +23.7 | Actual Pt. Margin: Alabama +25 | ||||||
The Alabama offensive line still leaves something to be desired, and the Tide offense is an abomination on passing downs, but the defense kept forcing Ole Miss into second- or third-and-long, and combined with some fourth-down stops and just enough offense, the result was a healthy win over a good team.
Loading comments...