clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

The Utah State Aggies And The Duke Of The WAC

NOTE: Confused? Don't miss the definitions and footnotes at the bottom. And as always, if you don't like numbers, just skip to the words.

As I mentioned in one of the first profiles of this long, arduous series, you develop random attachments to random teams in college sports. I always find myself rooting for North Texas because they were my Video Game Underdog of choice. And I almost always find myself rooting for Utah State, basically, because of this guy. Every March, I end up sticking up for the mid-major basketball teams that find themselves on the NCAA Tournament bubble despite semi-gaudy records. Utah State is the poster boy for such teams. They went 30-3 and ranked 20th in Ken Pomeroy's rankings this past basketball season, but they were saddled with a 12-seed in the NCAAs. No, they didn't play anybody, but that doesn't stop me from rooting for them.

I also love loyalty, and I love that USU's head basketball coach, Stew Morrill, has basically told all suitors from major conferences, "Thanks, but no thanks. I'm a Utah State guy." It makes me look at the navy blue and white in a positive light, even if they are basically the Duke of the WAC, incredibly successful and supportive on the basketball court, significantly less so on the football field. The Aggies' basketball attendance was almost half of their football attendance (not even Kentucky can claim that), and while they may win 25 roundball games per year ... they haven't won more than four football games in a calendar year since 2000 (5-6), they haven't finished with a winning season since 1996 (6-5), and they haven't won more than seven games in a season since 1974 (8-3), when Stew Morrill was beginning his coaching career as a 22-year old grad assistant at Gonzaga and current head football coach Gary Andersen was 14 years old. Yuck.

For what it's worth, Utah State is closer to playing decent football now than they have been in a while. The last three years, they have at least played at or near the level of your average WAC team, even if they've won just 11 games in the process. They battle through a downright cruel number of injuries in 2010, and they could be better for it this fall. At least, if they don't fall apart upon losing their interesting, athletic quarterback.

2010 Schedule & Results*

Record: 4-8 | Adj. Record: 4-8 | Final F/+ Rk**: 101
Date Opponent Score W-L Adj. Score Adj. W-L
4-Sep at Oklahoma 24-31 L 25.9 - 24.3 W
11-Sep Idaho State
38-17 W 24.9 - 33.6 L
18-Sep Fresno State 24-41 L 22.2 - 34.0 L
25-Sep at San Diego State 7-41 L 15.0 - 33.1 L
1-Oct BYU 31-16 W 37.8 - 17.1 W
9-Oct at Louisiana Tech 6-24 L 12.0 - 32.0 L
23-Oct Hawaii 7-45 L 6.1 - 30.4 L
30-Oct at Nevada 42-56 L 36.4 - 35.6 W
6-Nov New Mexico State 27-22 W 16.2 - 33.7 L
13-Nov at San Jose State 38-34 W 24.7 - 42.8 L
20-Nov Idaho 6-28 L 9.7 - 27.6 L
4-Dec at Boise State 14-50 L 31.3 - 28.7 W
Category Offense Rk Defense Rk
Points Per Game 22.0 94 33.8 101
Adj. Points Per Game 21.8 101 31.1 93

Heading into 2010, Utah State had actually managed a rare feat: they had improved for three straight seasons. But even the best rebuilding projects deal with occasional steps backwards, and an incredible number of injuries ensured that the Aggies' streak ended at three years. Losing their top two running backs and potentially their top two receivers to season-ending injury, they could not maintain any sort of consistency on the offensive side of the ball, and after looking solid in the opener against Oklahoma (that they almost beat the Sooners said more about the way Oklahoma played than Utah State ... but USU still played well), the roller coaster ride began. The offense was great against BYU and Nevada, heinous against Louisiana Tech, Hawaii and Idaho.

The defense, meanwhile, was rather consistent, but not in a great way. Strong performances versus Oklahoma and BYU were supplemented by touchdown-worse-than-average performances against virtually everybody else. But in matching their 2009 win total despite the issues, they arguably made quite a bit of progress. And as I always say, injuries are devastating in the present tense but rather beneficial in the future tense.


Category S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
OVERALL 99 91 107
RUSHING 100 96 98 Adj. Line Yards:
PASSING 99 86 109 97
Standard Downs 103 95 106 Adj. Sack Rate:
Passing Downs 65 51 81 97
Redzone 36 26 49
Q1 Rk 63 1st Down Rk 111
Q2 Rk 106 2nd Down Rk 75
Q3 Rk 61 3rd Down Rk 60
Q4 Rk 108

We typically talk quite a bit about last year in these piece, but for any number of reasons, "last year" doesn't tell us much about what is to come for Utah State. First of all, longtime starting quarterback Diondre Borel is gone. Not only is that an issue because none of his potential replacements have taken a snap in Logan, but also because whoever replaces him will be a major stylistic departure. Borel became more of a passer over time -- his pre-sack rushing yards dropped from 788 in 2008, to 578 in 2009, to 488 in 2010; meanwhile, his passing yards rose from 1,705 in 2008 to 2,885 in 2009 before falling in 2010 -- but he was still much more of a dual-threat guy than either of the players most likely to win the job this year.

Who are the replacement candidates? Junior college transfer Adam Kennedy and redshirt freshman Alex Hart. Kennedy was last seen posting a 141.9 passer rating and completing 65% of his passes at San Joaquin Delta College in California, while Hart is a bit of a local legend; he led the nation with 4,442 passing yards and 47 touchdown passes at Jordan High School in Draper, UT. Both of them looked great at times this spring (they combined for 494 yards on 38-for-60 passing in the spring game), though you never know how much of that was due to them or how much was due to a thin defense breaking in a new scheme. Regardless, there is hope -- and complete inexperience -- here. (My guess: Hart wins the job. When you've got two even players, go with the one with more years of eligibility remaining.)

The other reason we cannot glean much about 2011 from 2010: injuries. Running back Robert Turbin (1,175 yards, +9.0 Adj. POE in 2009) missed all of last season with a torn ACL, receiver Stanley Morrison (616 yards, 18.7 per catch, 51% catch rate in 2009) missed the season with a foot issue, starting receiver Matt Austin tore up his knee after one game and running back Michael Smith (153 yards, 6.4 per carry, +1.9 Adj. POE) made it two full games. Think about your favorite team for a moment. Now remove top two backs and receivers from the equation. How well would your offense do? All four of these players are back, however, and when combined with players who got extra reps in 2010, they could make for one nice batch of skill position players ready to help whichever quarterback wins the job.

Of the boatload of other experienced skill position players, Kerwynn Williams (451 yards, 5.6 per carry, +11.6 Adj. POE; 110 receiving yards) is perhaps the most intriguing. A star kick returner, he is a "get the ball to him in space" kind of guy, rushing to the edge and catching short passes. He is not alone, however. Joey DeMartino (157 yards, 5.4 per carry, +1.0 Adj. POE) and big sophomore Robert Marshall (146 yards, 4.4 per carry, -1.9 Adj. POE) give the Aggies depth at running back, Xavier Martin (253 receiving yards, 21.1 per catch, 50% catch rate) and Austin Alder (139 yards, 19.9 per catch, 44% catch rate) give the passing game a couple of big-play options, and Eric Moats (218 yards, 10.9 per catch, 51% catch rate), Travis Van Leeuwen (171 yards, 10.7 per catch, 64% catch rate) and tight end Kellen Bartlett (222 yards, 14.8 per catch, 68% catch rate) are solid possession options. That's a lot of weapons for a WAC team.

Other tidbits:

  • Seven players with starting experience return up front, led by three-year starting guard Philip Gapelu and 2010 freshman All-American center Tyler Larsen. This obviously wasn't a spectacular line in 2010, but the 'veteranosity' is high, and the talent gets potentially supplemented by junior college tackle and former BYU Cougar Stetson Tenney, who was in for spring.
  • The 2010 offense was quite solid in the first and third quarters last year and awful in the second and fourth. That suggests a) good gameplans and b) horrible depth. We know (b) was true, but we'll see about (a). Their lack of first-down success certainly throws that theory into question.


Category S&P+ Rk Success
Rt. Rk
OVERALL 70 79 68
RUSHING 106 98 107 Adj. Line Yards:
PASSING 52 49 55 115
Standard Downs 89 93 85 Adj. Sack Rate:
Passing Downs 63 50 69 100
Redzone 104 112 101
Q1 Rk 99 1st Down Rk 92
Q2 Rk 34 2nd Down Rk 61
Q3 Rk 100 3rd Down Rk 70
Q4 Rk 87

Really, defense was not the issue in 2010. At least, not entirely. The Aggies' pass defense was downright solid, but they couldn't overcome a feckless front four. So ... they changed it to a front three. Genius move? Completely misguided? We'll see. Anderson takes his own reins as defensive coordinator; they are reins he knows well after spending five incredibly successful seasons as Utah's D.C. His biggest change will be visible from the start: he's making the change to a 3-4. With some highly interesting pieces at linebacker and in the secondary, this gamble could pay off, but it won't mean much if the line is still a complete pushover (i.e. if a boatload of newcomers don't affect immediate change).

The line is choc full of transfers and newbies. There's 305-pound junior college tackle Havea Lasike ... 350-pound former SMU tackle Evan Huihulu ... three-star junior college ends Al Lapuaho (6-foot-3, 280) and Paul Piukala (6-foot-4, 235) ... redshirt freshman end B.J. Larsen (6-foot-5, 253 pounds). Making the change to a three-man line typically results in an at least a temporary side disadvantage, but Andersen has attempted to account for that as best he can. (Lasike and Huahulu are particularly intriguing.) The newbies will join a couple of ends -- Quinn Garner (32.0 tackles, 5.0 TFL/sacks, 1 INT) and Levi Koskan (27.5 tackles, 8.5 TFL/sacks) -- who had some sporadic moments but clearly needed assistance.

Other tidbits:

  • Obviously linebackers are also vital to 3-4 success, and USU has some interesting components, at least on the inside. Bobby Wagner (97.0 tackles, 8.0 TFL/sacks, 4 PBU) is your prototypical 'tackling machine' inside 'backer, and Kyle Gallagher (61.5 tackles, 4.0 TFL/sacks, 3 PBU) and Jake Doughty (17.0 tackles, 1.0 TFL/sacks as a redshirt freshman) have shown the same propensity. It's on the outside where questions exist. The Aggies will need immediate production from junior college transfer and star recruit Bojay Filimoeatu, but even if they get it, that's only one starting spot. The other OLB spot appears to be redshirt freshman Tavaris McMillan's to lose. McMillan was evidently outstanding this spring, but depth is a serious issue here from my standpoint. The local media are a bit more optimistic, though, so we'll see.
  • The Aggies were PBU (passes broken up) machines last year. They didn't pick off many passes, and they forced almost no fumbles, resulting in terrible "Go After The Ball" scores, but PBU was not a problem. Though quite a few interesting pieces return, they must replace their two best PBU guys, corners Curtis Randle and Curtis Marsh (combined: 80.0 tackles, 4.0 TFL/sacks, 4 INT, 21 PBU). Safety seems well-manned with Walter McClenton (47.0 tackles, 2.5 TFL/sacks, 2 PBU), Alfred Bowden (22.0 tackles, 2 PBU) and McKade Brady (15.0 tackles, 1.5 TFL/sacks), but Andersen was concerned enough about cornerback depth to move successful possession receiver Dontel Watkins (492 yards, 11.7 per catch, 61% catch rate) to the defensive side of the ball. (That, or he was that confident about receiver depth. Or both.)

Utah State's 2010 Season Set to Music

Because any Oak Ridge Boys reference is a good Oak Ridge Boys reference...

"Bad Bad Pain," by North Mississippi Allstars
"Hurt," by Nine Inch Nails
"Hurt Like Mine," by The Black Keys
"Hurt Me Soul," by Lupe Fiasco
"Hurts So Good," by John Mellencamp
"I Guess It Never Hurts to Hurt Sometimes," by Oak Ridge Boys
"It Don't Hurt," by Sheryl Crow
"Love Hurts," by approximately 4,000,000 different artists
"We Hurt Too," by Funkadelic
"A World of Hurt," by Drive-By Truckers

Fun Stat Nerd Tidbit

Teams Who Improved For Three Straight Years (2006-10)
2007-09 Cincinnati
2007-10 Stanford
2007-09 Temple
2007-09 Texas Tech
2007-09 Utah State
2008-10 Boise State
2008-10 Navy
2008-10 Syracuse
2008-10 UAB

Stanford is the only team to do it four years in a row, and UAB is the only team besides Utah State not to have gone to at least one bowl during their streak.

Summary and Projection Factors

Below is a small handful of projection and change factors most pertinent to the Football Outsiders' preseason projections you will find in the Football Outsiders Almanac 2011.

Four-Year F/+ Rk 107
Five-Year Recruiting Rk 105
TO Margin/Adj. TO Margin**** -5 / -5.5
Approx. Ret. Starters (Off. / Def.) 13 (8, 5)
Yds/Pt Margin***** +3.1

This is not a team projections will love. Our projections place them just 108th in the country, which makes sense considering their recent record, recent performance and recent recruiting. That said, they have two things going for them:

1) An incredibly easy schedule. Despite projecting as the 13th-worst team in FBS, they have a projected record of 5-7 and are given a 24% chance of finishing with six wins or better (17% chance at 6-6, 6% chance at 7-5, 1% chance at 8-4). Home games against Weber State, Colorado State, Wyoming, Louisiana Tech and San Jose State are all incredibly winnable, as are road games New Mexico State and maybe Idaho. The problem, of course, is that the other five games (@Auburn, @BYU, @Fresno State, @Hawaii, Nevada) are, to put it kindly, less winnable, meaning their bowl eligibility hopes hinge on winning almost every single winnable game. That's rough, especially for a team not used to winning more than four games in a season.

2) Gary Andersen. I really like him, and I think if anybody can bring football success to Logan, it's him. It just takes time. He has better depth to work with now than he has recently, and he has a strong defensive mind, but he is probably still a year or two away from seeing all the pieces put together in full.



Be sure to purchase your Football Outsiders Almanac 2011 today! The college portion is available for just $5, and if you pre-order the entire book, you can download the college portion instantly.


* For more on the 'Adj. Score' and 'Adj. Record' measures below, feel free to read this Football Outsiders column. Adj. Score is a look at how a team would have performed in a given week if playing a perfectly average team, with a somewhat average number of breaks and turnovers. The idea for the measure is simple: what if everybody in the country played exactly the same opponent every single week? Who would have done the best? It is an attempt to look at offensive and defensive consistency without getting sidetracked by easy or difficult schedules. And yes, with adjusted score you can allow a negative number of points, which is strangely satisfying.

** F/+ rankings are the official rankings for the college portion of Football Outsiders. They combine my own S&P+ rankings (based on play-by-play data) with Brian Fremeau's drives-based FEI rankings.

*** What is S&P+? Think of it as an OPS (the "On-Base Plus Slugging" baseball measure) for football. The 'S' stands for success rates, a common Football Outsiders efficiency measure that basically serves as on-base percentage. The 'P' stands for PPP+, an explosiveness measure that stands for EqPts Per Play. The "+" means it has been adjusted for the level of opponent, obviously a key to any good measure in college football. S&P+ is measured for all non-garbage time plays in a given college football game. Plays are counted within the following criteria: when the score is within 28 points in the first quarter, within 24 points in the second quarter, within 21 points in the third quarter, and within 16 points (i.e. two possession) in the fourth quarter.  For more about this measure, visit the main S&P+ page at Football Outsiders.

**** Adj. TO Margin is what a team's turnover margin would have been if they had recovered exactly 50 percent of all the fumbles that occurred in their games. If there is a huge difference between TO Margin and Adj. TO Margin (in other words, if fumbles and unlucky bounces were the main source of a good/bad TO margin), that suggests that a team's luck was particularly good or bad and might even out the next season.

*****Phil Steele has long tracked Yards Per Point as a means of looking at teams that were a little too efficient or inefficient the previous season. A positive Yds/Pt Margin means a team's offense was less efficient than opponents' offenses, and to the extent that luck was involved, their luck might even out the next year.