Stay connected
for news and updates
Iowa State 44, Iowa 41
|
|
Iowa |
Iowa State |
|
|
Iowa |
Iowa State |
| Close % |
100.0% |
|
STANDARD DOWNS |
| Field Position % |
58.3% |
66.7% |
|
Success Rate |
43.8% |
48.5% |
| Leverage % |
66.7% |
73.3% |
|
PPP |
0.26 |
0.27 |
|
|
|
|
S&P |
0.701 |
0.752 |
| TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
| EqPts |
24.1 |
31.5 |
|
PASSING DOWNS |
| Close Success Rate |
38.9% |
50.0% |
|
Success Rate |
29.2% |
54.2% |
| Close PPP |
0.33 |
0.35 |
|
PPP |
0.48 |
0.58 |
| Close S&P |
0.724 |
0.850 |
|
S&P |
0.770 |
1.122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RUSHING |
|
TURNOVERS |
| EqPts |
10.0 |
11.9 |
|
Number |
1 |
3 |
| Close Success Rate |
40.5% |
47.1% |
|
Turnover Pts |
5.2 |
16.3 |
| Close PPP |
0.24 |
0.23 |
|
Turnover Pts Margin |
+11.1 |
-11.1 |
| Close S&P |
0.643 |
0.704 |
|
|
|
|
| Line Yards/carry |
3.16 |
2.94 |
|
Q1 S&P |
0.996 |
0.826 |
|
|
|
|
Q2 S&P |
0.231 |
0.790 |
| PASSING |
|
Q3 S&P |
0.408 |
0.689 |
| EqPts |
14.1 |
19.6 |
|
Q4 S&P |
0.917 |
0.831 |
| Close Success Rate |
36.7% |
53.9% |
|
|
|
|
| Close PPP |
0.47 |
0.50 |
|
1st Down S&P |
0.557 |
0.599 |
| Close S&P |
0.838 |
1.041 |
|
2nd Down S&P |
0.737 |
0.749 |
| SD/PD Sack Rate |
0.0% / 6.7% |
0.0% / 6.7% |
|
3rd Down S&P |
1.045 |
1.359 |
| Projected Pt. Margin: Iowa +3.7 | Actual Pt. Margin: Iowa State +3 |
Five Thoughts
- This is the Iowa defense, right? Because giving up big passing downs gain after big passing downs gain doesn't seem like the Iowa defense. Iowa is dealing with a lot of turnover right now, and on Saturday, a general lack of experience led to a general lack of discipline on passing downs.
- The first thing we remember from this game is Steele Jantz making some plays with his legs. But what won the game for ISU was Jantz's sudden ability to pass. A week after completing 18 of 40 passes to his team and three more to Northern Iowa, Jantz torched Iowa for 279 yards, four touchdowns, no picks and a 1.041 Passing S&P.
- Iowa running back Marcus Coker gained 140 yards in 35 carries. Efficient, but completely lacking in explosiveness. If you believe the line yardage figure, more than three-quarters of those yards were attributable to the offensive line. They did their job, and it's possible that Coker didn't make the most of his opportunities.
- This game was the polar opposite of Minnesota-NMSU. In that game, both teams moved the ball until third down, then fell apart. In this game, teams didn't move the ball until third down.
- One quarter in, it looked like this wasn't going to be much of a game. ISU blew a chance by losing a fumble on a bad snap from the Iowa 5, and UI marched 82 yards for a touchdown. ISU went three-and-out (stuffed on third-and-1), and the quarter ended with Iowa marching for what would end up a field goal. It seemed ISU was too mistake-prone, and Iowa was just too damn physical. But starting with a Coker fumble inside the Iowa red zone, the game flipped.
There are 0 Comments. Add Yours.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.